![]() Webroot says that reboots are not required after installation (yep, that's been my experience!), and that updates are totally automatic. It's now been 3 days, and not a single user has reported any issues. What then happens is that Webroot does a scan of the boot drive, and in about 6 to 20 minutes, the client shows up in the Webroot management console. ![]() The Webroot client took between 3 and 8 seconds to install (REALLY!!). ![]() All but 2 machines on the LAN boot from SSDs, which made the removal/reboot process that much faster The longest part of this was uninstall/reboot of the old product. In under 5 mins per workstation, I was able to remove the older product, reboot, and install the Webroot client. The next day, I spent about 45 minutes on a scheduled call with a Webroot tech, going over some of the finer points of the cloud interface and configuration settings, made some tweaks, and was able to begin client deployment of my Webroot trial. I signed up for a Webroot trial, and had a Webroot client running in 5 minutes. That product is, mind you, a respected product, but its complexity and lack of user-friendliness is beyond belief, at least to me.Īfter HOURS of support and attempted support with the vendor, and living through an apparent re-organization of that product's vendor, I threw in the towel and went to Webroot. I'm in the process of shedding another AV product that I could NEVER wrap my brain around. BTW Please find and read Neil Rubenking's PC Mag review of Webroot. If I understand correctly the there is a load balancing from all the network cards, so there is no dedicated network card for outgoing traffic.Ĭan I dedicate one of them for all outgoin.Thanks, Spiceworks, for just being! Here's my way of giving something to the SW community: Hi guy's.I have a server (win srv 16) with some network cards, Dedicated Ethernet network card for outgoing traffic on server? Networking.One day I am wearing shorts and a t-shirt enjoying Itis not my intention to add weight to another generalisation about we Brits,īut this weather is weird. Greetings fellow Spicepeople and welcome to another working week. ![]() Spark! Pro Series - 7th August 2023 Spiceworks Originals.Snap! - Acoustic Hack, Professional Uno, Tahoe Trashbots, Blindness Cure? Spiceworks Originalsįlashback: August 7, 1944: IBM presents ASCC Giant Brain to Harvard (Read more HERE.)īonus Flashback: August 7, 1954: First space cabin simulator (Read more HERE.).I could fix this by paying extra 10 bucks or stick with coax, but I will ask this to you guys. Is this Possible. I recently upgraded my ISP from Coax to Fiber, but I was not aware of CGNAT and it killed a lot of my stuff i had port forwarding mainly plex. Home Network Puzzle help needed Networking.another, cheaper endpoint product, but to me the cost is justified if it prevents a ransomware incident. I had to do a bit of convincing that it was worth spending the money on SO vs. The install required a reboot, and the SO system tray icon didn't show up until after the reboot (even though it seemed to be active). In our case, we removed Symantec Endpoint Protection after the Broadcom fiasco, and installed SentinelOne (via GP). Deployment seems to have been pretty straight forward. ![]() My understanding is that you can't buy SentinelOne directly as a small company.Īgreed that the console is very simple and intuitive, but seems to have some powerful options. It's not a cheap product - we are paying CDN $6 per month per endpoint, but that includes management of the product. We are just wrapping up our SentinelOne deployment as we move to a new MSP. Webroot has rollback capability, but SentinelOne has the patent on encrypting shadow copies, as ransomware starts to get smarter and attack those as well. Webroot is a great product, very fast, but you don't need both. If you're considering SentinelOne, There's no need to keep Webroot.Īgreed. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |